1. Purpose

This Policy outlines how we ensure accuracy, transparency, and fairness in all informational content published on our website. Our aim is to build trust with readers by verifying facts and addressing errors promptly.

2. Scope

Applies to all content formats on our site:

  • Articles

  • Blog posts

  • News updates

  • Resource pages

  • Multimedia (e.g., videos, infographics)

3. Standards & Principles

We commit to:

  1. Accuracy – Presenting verified information from reliable, authoritative sources.

  2. Transparency – Clearly citing sources or explaining when information is based on inference or expert opinion.

  3. Impartiality – Presenting multiple perspectives when viewpoints differ.

  4. Correction of Errors – Addressing inaccuracies swiftly and transparently.

4. Source Quality

Our preferred sources include:

  • Peer-reviewed academic work

  • Reputable news outlets

  • Government and official organizational reports

  • Subject‑matter experts and primary data

  • Direct quotes from interviews or official statements
    We avoid relying on:

  • Anonymous or unverified internet sources

  • Opinion without evidence

  • Outdated or disreputable websites

5. Verification Process

Every factual claim undergoes the following review:

  1. Author’s Verification – Initial fact-checking by the content creator.

  2. Editorial Audit – Independent review by an editor or fact-checker to confirm source quality and relevance.

  3. Date Sensitivity Check – Especially for time‑sensitive claims, we verify all dates are current and contextually accurate.

6. Citations & Sourcing

  • Inline citations or footnotes for all factual claims.

  • Direct links to original materials whenever possible.

  • Attribution format: “According to [Source Name, Publication, Date]…”

  • If a source is paywalled or behind a subscription, we summarize essential data and note its status.

7. Opinion vs. Fact

Opinions are clearly labeled as such and are supported by:

  • Contextual analysis

  • Credible facts

  • Research references

8. Updates & Corrections

  • Regular Reviews: We periodically revisit long‑standing content to ensure continued accuracy.

  • Correction Notices: Any factual error discovered is corrected swiftly, and a note (“Correction: …”) is appended at the end of the piece stating what was changed and when.

  • Reader Tips: We openly invite readers to submit corrections or feedback via [email/contact form link].

9. Accountability

  • Fact‑checking team: Details the names or roles (e.g., Editor‑in‑Chief, Fact‑Checker) responsible.

  • Escalation: Serious or disputed issues are escalated to senior editorial staff, with corrections issued within 48 hours of verification.

10. Conflict of Interest

Our editorial decisions are guided solely by the pursuit of truth and accurate reporting.
Contributors, including staff, affiliates, or sponsors, must:

  • Disclose any potential conflicts of interest (financial, personal, or professional).

  • Recuse themselves from fact-checking or editing content where a conflict exists.

11. Reader Engagement

  • A “Submit Correction or Feedback” link (or clearly labeled contact method) is featured at the end of every post.

  • Reader inputs are reviewed systematically by our team and, when verified, are incorporated with appropriate correction notices.

12. Review Cycle

This Policy is reviewed and updated at least once every 12 months or more frequently to reflect changes in:

  • Editorial standards

  • Technology (e.g., evolving verification tools)

  • Legal/regulatory requirements

Last updated: June 13, 2025